-
Approach writing as a recursive process
This screenshot is from my rough draft, as you can see the screenshot from my final copy is completely different the draft is from a in class then continued into homework and it was journal question 17. When I was approaching revising I broke it down into chunks, to salvage parts for my revised introduction. I first changed my complete structure of my essay to persuade, include other authors and have better flow with the course work assigned. Once I did this I was able to use my cell phone after we had class discussions about them it sparked ideas into me to connect what Kelly and Carr are saying. Once this spark was created I went back into the readings to find out more. I grab bits and pieces from my own personal life to connect to Kelley. I did this on every Idea from the journal post. When I went back re read the article it changed my whole Perspective of it and I was able to make connections left and right to Carr and Kelley.
In the highlighted screenshot I bring in Carr with a quote. After reading the passage 3 times I was able to unlock the message he is putting across, this allowed me to make self to text connections. When reading the article over I also made and browsed over comments and underlined parts of the article that I questioned.
Overall I think this puts me into the advanced journeyman section. With restucering it is either there or it isn’t. I believe the in class discussions were a huge benefit for me and this made me a better student overall. To achieve mastery for me I think I need to get to the point I am in the first place to be honest.
-
Integrate ideas with those of others
I was able to make text to self connections with Carr and Kelley. This helped support my ideas, I also have clear distinctions between my ideas and other authors and helps the reader understand more.
In the highlighted text I use Kelleys introduction and make a deep connection with it. It took me multiple reads of the article to grasp a deep understanding of it to make a connection. In class we talked about this quote in depth and I believe this was a milestone in the project for me.
I believe that the work I have produced in intergatreding my ideas with others puts in into the advanced journeyman level. I say this because my ideas are clearly shown different the other authors. With that said I also challenge and question other authors at the same time.
-
Active reading, critical reading & informal reading response
I am going to use pictures from “Is google making us stupid ?” By Nicholas Carr and Technophilia by Kevin Kelley. While reading these articles I used a pen, highlighter and sticky notes to annotate and question the reading
#1
The picture above is my annotation of the first page. When first reading it I didn’t understand it that well so i questioned my reading and the article itself. This allowed me to look for answers so once I was reading it It made more sense every bit.
I put myself into the advanced journeyman level for active reading. I say this because I question, annotate and explore the ideas of other authors. I dont think this would of happened if we didn’t go over the readings in depth in class.
-
Critique own and others’ work
I am going to use screenshots of comments I left on Josh and Teddy’s project 2 drafts I address claims,evidence and organization. The in class peer review sessions helped me a lot personally. I think being able to talk with the person right in front of you makes better comments.
#2,#3
This comment shows organization in the introduction even tho it is a primarily supportive comment. The screenshot for the comment below shows me asking questions. The evidence and organization wasn’t right for me so I had to make sure Josh knew that he needed to introduce Carr before he used his name and work.
-
Document Work using appropriate conventions
I pan on using screenshots from my project 2 to show documentation of work using appropriate connections. I do this by using signal phrasing and effective quote choice.
#4
In the screenshotted highlighted text I use a Kelley quote. I signal phrase and the quote flows well with the paper. I decided to use this quote when I made the connection with phone use and drug addicts.
With my work in document work with appropriate conventions I believe I am in the advanced journeyman level 3. In my project 2 I have a work cited page. This and my signal phrasing puts my into this level.
-
Control individualized Error Patterns
I am going to use my project 2 for controlled individual error patterns. I used my introductions to compare the two.During this process went over the paper and added more commas to have better flow.
#5,#6
In the screenshots above are from my draft and final copy. I went back to it and added commas and changed the structure of the introductions. I did this by reading the article over again and after the insights I took from the class discussions.